Sunday 26 January 2014

Acts 13. 13-52



The Speaker
Luke the storyteller doesn't waste words or bore his readers by repeating the same speeches over and over. Instead he gives us key speeches, like this one, as an example of how Paul preached in the synagogue... and it was Paul who was the preacher! Not Barnabas. In fact, Luke has already started referring to “Paul and his companions.” There's something very gracious and lovely about someone like Barnabas who was prepared to step back and allow the younger Christian, the less experienced and less proven one, flourish. There is something lovely about having the honesty and humility to admit “I don't have the gifts for this, but my younger brother has”. Barnabas had that wonderful quality. Son of Encouragement.

The Strategy:
Pisidian Antioch in the middle of modern Turkey was not a huge place – but it was a strategic place, on an important road. They go to the Synagogue on the Sabbath day; as visitors and maybe with a reputation for knowing the Scripture, maybe identified as Rabbis, they are asked if they have a word of encouragement for the congregation. That is their cue to talk about Jesus. The strategy was to begin with their natural contacts. And note that it became one of Paul's hallmarks, to do so.

The Speech
Look at the message Paul preaches in the Synagogue. Paul preached a narrative sermon telling the story of God's people and then the story of Jesus. There are two main themes Paul speaks about: firstly, Jewish history; and secondly, Jesus himself. But why does he start with the history of Israel? Why does he go back 1400 years, to before Moses? He has two reasons:

Firstly, Theological
Starting with the history of the Nation identifies Jesus as Messiah, the Coming King from David's family, the “Promised One” sent to fulfil prophecy.

It's as if there was a huge treasure chest of promises, that Israel waited for God to open up. In that chest there are
  • Freedom from oppression;
  • Healing;
  • justice,
  • peace,
  • the Spirit poured on all kinds of people;
  • knowing God personally,
  • the forgiveness of sins.
These word Israel used for the contents of this treasure chest, is “The Kingdom of God” or “the Kingdom of heaven”. The expected their Messiah to bring this “Kingdom”.

Paul refers to the work of John the Baptist, preaching “repentance”. He is quite clear that it is sin that keeps that treasure chest locked up. Preparing the way for Messiah to come, means turning from your sin, from the wrong stuff inside you. Sin is the padlock that keeps that treasure chest locked up, and its treasures, the Kingdom beyond our reach.

And then Paul talks about Jesus. By tying the Jesus story in as clearly as he does with the story of Israel, Paul is saying “Jesus is the One who brings the promised Kingdom, Jesus is Messiah”... He announced the Kingdom. He demonstrated the Kingdom. By his death he deals with the sin that keeps the Kingdom out of our reach. In his resurrection, he proved that he is Messiah, showed that he is the Victor, that sin is dealt with and the Kingdom is an open reality now and for all eternity, for those who know Jesus. Jesus came and lived, and died and rose again, so that you can enjoy what is in the Treasure Chest... Or to put it another way, eh has two main things to say about Jesus. Jesus brings the Kingdom, and Jesus deals with our Sin. He is the Change-bringer and he is the sin-bearer.

That is important. You may run into people who want to say “Jesus was great, he was all about justice and peace and the Sermon on the Mount; and Paul was rubbish, banging on about sin.” And you may run into other people who want to say “The only thing that matters about Jesus is that he was God the Son who died for our sins and rose again.” Both of these views are wrong. Neither of them get Jesus right. Neither of them properly understand Paul. You can't have the Kingdom without the forgiveness of sins. And you can't have the forgiveness of sins without repentance and the Kingdom of god. You cant have what's inside the box, without using the key. And you have to be a wee bit daft, to have the key and not open the box.

In fact the gap between Jesus and Paul is a false one. Paul doesn't have much to say about the Kingdom of God. But he does tell us about Jesus the “Change-bringer” in different ways: “life in the Spirit”, our riches in Christ, Jesus the Victor; the New Creation, being the Church.

A proper understanding of Jesus as Future bringer, gives a purpose and a point to the forgiveness of our sins. The gospel is NOT that we can have our sins forgiven so we get to Heaven. The Gospel is that we have our sins forgiven so we can begin to live the life of he Kingdom of God in the here and now and continue to live in it for all eternity. The nature of the Kingdom, the reality of the reign of God, is what we are saved for. We are saved because God so loved the world. We are saved because God wants his world to live in his peace; to know his presence.

Secondly, Missional,
Paul is making the point about the Kingdom as well as the Cross. But there’s another reason why begins with history. He speaks as a Jew who knows Israel’s history, to other Jews who shared that history. He want to speak in a way that helps them turn to Jesus. He points (v. 27 )out that “the people of Jerusalem and their rulers did not recognize Jesus” and wants his hearers not to miss the boat. When he spoke to Pagans in Athens, he took a different approach. There he began with “an unknown God”, what God is like, where we fit into the divine scheme of things. (Acts 17. 22ff, Luke's next record of Paul's preaching.) Now the message is the same. Jesus is the “Change-bringer” and the “Sin-bearer”. But the context is different. The unchanging Good News is contextualized, or presented differently to different contexts. Without changing it, we need to communicate it in a way that resonates with the culture we are talking to.

The four Gospels are an example of contextualisation. Mark was written first simply to tell the story to ordinary people. Matthew was clearly written fro mainly Jewish Christians, in a church that was just getting to grips with the idea that maybe the Gospel was for gentiles too. Luke was written for non-Jewish listeners, to tell them the story of Jesus and be able them to be part of this developing Church. John is the result of deeper reflection, written for thinking, culture-crossing people.
So, what does the Gospel sound like in your context? How do you talk about God? How do you talk about the mess the world is in? How do you talk about God having a better plan? How do you talk about God as the God of transformations? How do you talk about Jesus being change bringer and the sin-bearer?

The sequel
1. The conversation continued both formally (v. 42) and informally (v. 43) Many who had been listening continued to hang around and were encouraged to press in to discover God's grace for themselves. As the team focussed on those who wanted to listen – the Gentiles – they found ready listeners who were open to put their faith in Jesus.
2. Conflict was caused. Jealousy, blindness to the truth, arguments, abusive talk (v. 46), and before long, others manipulated into causing trouble (v. 50). Paul and Barnabas shook the dust off their feet as a warning to those who were digging their heels in in opposition to the Gospel. There will be conflict. There will be opposition. The enemy will do what he can to prevent the Good News from being preached, being received, and acted upon.
3. Churches were created and encouraged. Paul and Barnabas moved on, to the next big city, Iconium, look what they left behind. A group of Disciples who were “filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit.” (v 52) The Good news of the kingdom and the Cross, of Jesus the Change bringer and sin bearer, results in men and women becoming disciples, but it results in Kingdom communities of faith being formed. What a wonderful thing to leave behind: a Church full of joy and of the Holy Spirit!

© Gilmour Lilly January  2014

No comments:

Post a Comment